+51.3%
U vs UMAC
+182.0%
-130.7%
-65.4%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | UMAC | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +5.2% | -4.6% | +9.9% | +5.6% |
| 7D | +2.6% | -5.2% | +7.8% | +2.8% |
| 30D | +27.6% | -36.4% | +63.9% | +31.2% |
| 3M | +15.3% | -58.6% | +73.9% | +21.8% |
| 6M | +96.4% | -24.6% | +121.0% | +94.3% |
| YTD | +19.6% | -11.5% | +31.0% | +15.1% |
| 1Y | +42.1% | +16.9% | +25.2% | +33.7% |
| All | +51.3% | +182.0% | -130.7% | +23.0% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside UMAC.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus UMAC return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × UMAC return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded UMAC wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling