+104.4%
U vs GLDM
-14.2%
+118.6%
-19.4%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 6mo.
| Period | Portfolio | GLDM | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -1.0% | -0.9% | -0.1% | -0.4% |
| 7D | -3.8% | -0.5% | -3.3% | -3.4% |
| 30D | +17.5% | +4.4% | +13.0% | +13.3% |
| 3M | +38.7% | -1.1% | +39.8% | +40.0% |
| 6M | +104.4% | -13.7% | +118.1% | +133.1% |
| All | +104.4% | -14.2% | +118.6% | +133.1% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside GLDM.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus GLDM return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × GLDM return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 6mo: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded GLDM wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
6mo analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling