+425.2%
TXG vs ZCMD
-99.9%
+525.1%
-28.0%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 1y.
| Period | Portfolio | ZCMD | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +3.3% | -7.1% | +10.4% | +3.3% |
| 7D | +9.5% | -5.4% | +14.9% | +9.5% |
| 30D | +18.8% | -24.8% | +43.6% | +18.8% |
| 3M | +136.1% | -62.8% | +198.9% | +135.5% |
| 6M | +235.2% | -99.5% | +334.8% | +219.7% |
| YTD | +320.5% | -99.8% | +420.3% | +311.2% |
| 1Y | +425.2% | -99.9% | +525.1% | +423.5% |
| All | +425.2% | -99.9% | +525.1% | +423.5% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside ZCMD.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus ZCMD return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × ZCMD return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 1y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded ZCMD wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
1y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling