+255.9%
TXG vs NIO
-55.0%
+310.9%
-40.6%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 1y.
| Period | Portfolio | NIO | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -1.5% | -4.9% | +3.4% | -0.8% |
| 7D | -1.8% | -14.5% | +12.6% | +0.5% |
| 30D | -20.4% | -15.0% | -5.4% | -18.5% |
| 3M | +0.1% | -35.6% | +35.6% | +5.1% |
| 6M | +176.2% | -55.7% | +231.8% | +193.9% |
| YTD | +256.8% | -43.1% | +299.9% | +289.1% |
| 1Y | +255.9% | -53.5% | +309.4% | +327.5% |
| All | +255.9% | -55.0% | +310.9% | +327.5% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside NIO.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus NIO return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × NIO return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 1y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded NIO wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
1y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling