+361.7%
TXG vs NIO
-37.4%
+399.1%
-28.0%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 1y.
| Period | Portfolio | NIO | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -0.9% | -1.6% | +0.7% | -0.7% |
| 7D | +1.8% | -13.0% | +14.8% | +3.5% |
| 30D | +32.0% | -18.3% | +50.3% | +35.2% |
| 3M | +87.0% | -33.2% | +120.2% | +94.9% |
| 6M | +180.1% | -21.5% | +201.6% | +188.1% |
| YTD | +284.1% | -25.5% | +309.6% | +298.3% |
| 1Y | +361.7% | -38.0% | +399.7% | +393.5% |
| All | +361.7% | -37.4% | +399.1% | +393.5% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside NIO.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus NIO return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × NIO return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 1y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded NIO wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
1y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling