+183.7%
TXG vs MSTZ
-99.3%
+283.0%
-69.6%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for all.
| Period | Portfolio | MSTZ | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -0.9% | +2.6% | -3.5% | -0.6% |
| 7D | +1.8% | -29.7% | +31.5% | -1.3% |
| 30D | +32.0% | -65.3% | +97.3% | +20.0% |
| 3M | +87.0% | -57.3% | +144.3% | +79.1% |
| 6M | +180.1% | -61.6% | +241.7% | +171.4% |
| YTD | +284.1% | -78.3% | +362.4% | +266.3% |
| 1Y | +361.7% | -30.2% | +391.9% | +443.2% |
| All | +183.7% | -99.3% | +283.0% | +84.7% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside MSTZ.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus MSTZ return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × MSTZ return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over all: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded MSTZ wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
all analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling