+53.4%
TXG vs EPAM
-33.7%
+87.1%
-87.6%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | EPAM | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +2.1% | -3.9% | +6.0% | +3.2% |
| 7D | -15.4% | +13.4% | -28.8% | -19.9% |
| 30D | -22.1% | +47.1% | -69.2% | -33.6% |
| 3M | +30.0% | +71.2% | -41.2% | +4.1% |
| 6M | +160.7% | +48.9% | +111.8% | +115.5% |
| YTD | +263.5% | -22.2% | +285.7% | +301.3% |
| 1Y | +356.0% | -5.2% | +361.2% | +357.7% |
| 3Y | +53.4% | -34.9% | +88.3% | +50.5% |
| All | +53.4% | -33.7% | +87.1% | +50.5% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside EPAM.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus EPAM return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × EPAM return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded EPAM wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling