+45.2%
TTWO vs NIO
-64.4%
+109.6%
-27.7%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | NIO | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -1.0% | -2.4% | +1.4% | -0.9% |
| 7D | -2.3% | -4.1% | +1.8% | -2.1% |
| 30D | -16.7% | -23.2% | +6.5% | -15.6% |
| 3M | -0.4% | -29.9% | +29.5% | +1.3% |
| 6M | -1.6% | -25.1% | +23.5% | -0.4% |
| YTD | -17.5% | -27.5% | +9.9% | -16.5% |
| 1Y | -14.8% | -41.1% | +26.3% | -13.0% |
| All | +45.2% | -64.4% | +109.6% | +45.7% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside NIO.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus NIO return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × NIO return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded NIO wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling