+48.2%
TTWO vs NI
+68.9%
-20.7%
-27.7%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | NI | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -0.7% | 0.0% | -0.7% | -0.7% |
| 7D | +0.4% | 0.0% | +0.3% | +0.4% |
| 30D | -11.3% | -1.4% | -9.9% | -11.2% |
| 3M | +1.6% | -10.6% | +12.2% | +2.6% |
| 6M | +2.1% | -9.3% | +11.4% | +2.8% |
| YTD | -15.8% | +1.1% | -17.0% | -16.7% |
| 1Y | -12.6% | +3.4% | -16.0% | -14.0% |
| 3Y | +48.2% | +67.9% | -19.7% | +37.0% |
| All | +48.2% | +68.9% | -20.7% | +37.0% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside NI.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus NI return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × NI return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded NI wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling