+49.2%
TTWO vs ENB
+69.7%
-20.4%
-27.7%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | ENB | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +2.8% | -3.8% | +6.6% | +3.3% |
| 7D | +1.3% | -4.6% | +5.9% | +1.9% |
| 30D | -13.4% | -5.2% | -8.2% | -12.8% |
| 3M | +3.1% | -13.4% | +16.5% | +5.0% |
| 6M | +3.8% | -7.8% | +11.6% | +4.6% |
| YTD | -15.3% | +4.9% | -20.1% | -17.0% |
| 1Y | -11.1% | +3.2% | -14.3% | -12.6% |
| All | +49.2% | +69.7% | -20.4% | +26.7% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside ENB.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus ENB return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × ENB return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded ENB wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling