-82.3%
TTD vs CSGP
-61.9%
-20.4%
-90.7%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | CSGP | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -4.4% | -2.4% | -1.9% | -3.3% |
| 7D | +6.3% | -4.1% | +10.4% | +8.4% |
| 30D | -23.9% | +2.3% | -26.2% | -25.1% |
| 3M | -31.4% | -8.2% | -23.2% | -29.3% |
| 6M | -42.7% | -35.1% | -7.6% | -30.6% |
| YTD | -62.0% | -54.0% | -8.0% | -46.9% |
| 1Y | -72.2% | -65.3% | -6.9% | -56.1% |
| All | -82.3% | -61.9% | -20.4% | -73.7% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside CSGP.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus CSGP return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × CSGP return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded CSGP wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling