+85.8%
TT vs NIO
-62.1%
+148.0%
-24.4%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | NIO | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -4.4% | -3.0% | -1.4% | -4.2% |
| 7D | -9.0% | -3.6% | -5.4% | -8.8% |
| 30D | -17.6% | -8.0% | -9.6% | -17.3% |
| 3M | -18.7% | -31.2% | +12.5% | -17.0% |
| 6M | -17.4% | -45.8% | +28.3% | -14.8% |
| YTD | +1.5% | -37.3% | +38.8% | +3.7% |
| 1Y | -9.4% | -56.1% | +46.7% | -6.2% |
| All | +85.8% | -62.1% | +148.0% | +89.7% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside NIO.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus NIO return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × NIO return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded NIO wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling