+538.6%
TT vs GLDM
+221.7%
+316.9%
-40.5%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for all.
| Period | Portfolio | GLDM | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -4.4% | +0.8% | -5.2% | -4.5% |
| 7D | -9.0% | +1.9% | -10.9% | -9.2% |
| 30D | -17.6% | -1.7% | -15.9% | -17.4% |
| 3M | -18.7% | -3.5% | -15.1% | -18.3% |
| 6M | -17.4% | -10.1% | -7.4% | -16.4% |
| YTD | +1.5% | -5.0% | +6.6% | +2.7% |
| 1Y | -9.4% | +2.8% | -12.2% | -8.9% |
| 3Y | +85.1% | +105.1% | -20.0% | +75.6% |
| 5Y | +125.7% | +124.3% | +1.5% | +108.9% |
| All | +538.6% | +221.7% | +316.9% | +548.7% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside GLDM.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus GLDM return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × GLDM return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over all: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded GLDM wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
all analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling