-96.9%
TSLQ vs NIO
-56.4%
-40.5%
-98.0%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | NIO | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -11.1% | +0.6% | -11.7% | -10.8% |
| 7D | +8.5% | +6.9% | +1.6% | +11.8% |
| 30D | -4.8% | -4.7% | 0.0% | -6.0% |
| 3M | -34.9% | -28.1% | -6.8% | -41.8% |
| 6M | -10.6% | -41.7% | +31.1% | -24.4% |
| YTD | -13.4% | -33.1% | +19.8% | -21.0% |
| 1Y | -25.9% | -50.3% | +24.4% | -39.4% |
| 3Y | -96.9% | -54.4% | -42.6% | -96.5% |
| All | -96.9% | -56.4% | -40.5% | -96.5% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside NIO.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus NIO return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × NIO return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded NIO wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling