-34.2%
TSLL vs UMAC
-13.6%
-20.6%
-59.7%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 6mo.
| Period | Portfolio | UMAC | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +8.6% | +10.8% | -2.2% | +6.0% |
| 7D | -21.2% | -23.4% | +2.2% | -16.2% |
| 30D | -13.3% | -45.6% | +32.3% | -1.5% |
| 3M | +15.4% | -50.9% | +66.3% | +31.9% |
| 6M | -34.2% | -16.5% | -17.7% | -30.3% |
| All | -34.2% | -13.6% | -20.6% | -30.3% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside UMAC.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus UMAC return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × UMAC return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 6mo: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded UMAC wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
6mo analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling