-55.4%
TSLL vs NRG
+237.1%
-292.5%
-82.9%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for all.
| Period | Portfolio | NRG | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -11.8% | +6.4% | -18.3% | -16.0% |
| 7D | +1.9% | +7.1% | -5.2% | -3.3% |
| 30D | +17.8% | -1.4% | +19.2% | +17.6% |
| 3M | -37.0% | -10.5% | -26.6% | -34.6% |
| 6M | -37.7% | -26.7% | -10.9% | -27.3% |
| YTD | -51.4% | -24.5% | -26.8% | -45.2% |
| 1Y | -23.4% | -18.6% | -4.8% | -18.5% |
| 3Y | -30.8% | +227.1% | -257.9% | -70.5% |
| All | -55.4% | +237.1% | -292.5% | -81.5% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside NRG.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus NRG return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × NRG return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over all: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded NRG wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
all analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling