+248.5%
TRGP vs UMAC
+488.3%
-239.8%
-31.6%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 5y.
| Period | Portfolio | UMAC | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +0.2% | -3.2% | +3.4% | +0.2% |
| 7D | -0.6% | -4.0% | +3.4% | -0.5% |
| 30D | +10.0% | -9.4% | +19.4% | +10.0% |
| 3M | +7.6% | +3.0% | +4.6% | +7.4% |
| 6M | +26.8% | +27.2% | -0.4% | +25.6% |
| YTD | +60.6% | +84.7% | -24.1% | +57.9% |
| 1Y | +82.5% | +136.5% | -54.0% | +78.3% |
| All | +248.5% | +488.3% | -239.8% | +239.8% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside UMAC.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus UMAC return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × UMAC return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 5y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded UMAC wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
5y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling