+271.5%
TRGP vs SCCO
+178.0%
+93.6%
-31.6%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | SCCO | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +0.2% | -7.2% | +7.4% | +1.0% |
| 7D | -0.6% | -2.7% | +2.1% | -0.3% |
| 30D | +10.0% | -0.2% | +10.1% | +9.7% |
| 3M | +7.6% | +17.8% | -10.2% | +4.4% |
| 6M | +26.8% | +2.3% | +24.5% | +25.1% |
| YTD | +60.6% | +41.6% | +18.9% | +45.5% |
| 1Y | +82.5% | +101.9% | -19.4% | +50.5% |
| All | +271.5% | +178.0% | +93.6% | +172.4% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside SCCO.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus SCCO return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × SCCO return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded SCCO wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling