+254.5%
TRGP vs NVDX
+815.5%
-561.1%
-31.6%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for all.
| Period | Portfolio | NVDX | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -1.0% | -1.9% | +0.9% | -0.9% |
| 7D | -0.7% | -0.9% | +0.2% | -0.7% |
| 30D | +9.5% | +3.0% | +6.5% | +9.0% |
| 3M | +10.8% | +6.8% | +4.0% | +9.6% |
| 6M | +25.3% | +28.6% | -3.3% | +21.3% |
| YTD | +60.3% | +17.0% | +43.3% | +55.6% |
| 1Y | +84.6% | +27.0% | +57.5% | +76.2% |
| All | +254.5% | +815.5% | -561.1% | +203.9% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside NVDX.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus NVDX return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × NVDX return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over all: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded NVDX wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
all analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling