+248.2%
TRGP vs LCID
-90.9%
+339.1%
-31.6%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | LCID | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +3.4% | +9.4% | -6.0% | +3.2% |
| 7D | -7.2% | +20.0% | -27.2% | -7.5% |
| 30D | -4.2% | -5.0% | +0.8% | -4.1% |
| 3M | +7.0% | -48.9% | +55.8% | +8.7% |
| 6M | +11.2% | -43.2% | +54.5% | +12.1% |
| YTD | +51.1% | -65.9% | +117.0% | +55.6% |
| 1Y | +62.0% | -79.2% | +141.2% | +70.9% |
| 3Y | +248.2% | -90.4% | +338.6% | +287.3% |
| All | +248.2% | -90.9% | +339.1% | +287.3% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside LCID.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus LCID return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × LCID return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded LCID wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling