+482.8%
TRGP vs FLNC
-70.4%
+553.2%
-31.6%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for all.
| Period | Portfolio | FLNC | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -0.6% | +2.5% | -3.0% | -0.7% |
| 7D | +0.1% | -4.1% | +4.1% | +0.3% |
| 30D | +8.0% | -24.8% | +32.8% | +9.9% |
| 3M | +8.3% | -59.1% | +67.4% | +14.1% |
| 6M | +23.9% | -42.0% | +65.9% | +24.7% |
| YTD | +59.6% | -49.8% | +109.4% | +60.5% |
| 1Y | +79.4% | +43.1% | +36.3% | +60.4% |
| 3Y | +269.4% | -61.0% | +330.4% | +244.4% |
| All | +482.8% | -70.4% | +553.2% | +427.4% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside FLNC.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus FLNC return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × FLNC return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over all: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded FLNC wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
all analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling