+261.9%
TRGP vs COO
-22.0%
+283.9%
-31.6%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | COO | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -1.2% | -1.5% | +0.3% | -1.0% |
| 7D | +0.8% | -2.2% | +3.0% | +1.1% |
| 30D | +11.5% | -7.0% | +18.5% | +12.8% |
| 3M | +9.0% | +12.2% | -3.2% | +6.4% |
| 6M | +20.5% | -15.1% | +35.6% | +24.1% |
| YTD | +59.5% | -15.1% | +74.6% | +64.1% |
| 1Y | +77.9% | +2.3% | +75.6% | +75.9% |
| All | +261.9% | -22.0% | +283.9% | +253.0% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside COO.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus COO return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × COO return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded COO wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling