+270.9%
TRGP vs BLDR
-56.4%
+327.2%
-31.6%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | BLDR | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -1.0% | -1.9% | +0.9% | -0.9% |
| 7D | -0.7% | -2.7% | +2.0% | -0.6% |
| 30D | +9.5% | -14.7% | +24.2% | +10.5% |
| 3M | +10.8% | -20.8% | +31.6% | +12.2% |
| 6M | +25.3% | -35.3% | +60.7% | +29.7% |
| YTD | +60.3% | -40.3% | +100.6% | +66.9% |
| 1Y | +84.6% | -56.3% | +140.8% | +100.9% |
| All | +270.9% | -56.4% | +327.2% | +295.0% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside BLDR.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus BLDR return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × BLDR return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded BLDR wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling