+261.9%
TRGP vs ARMK
+120.0%
+141.9%
-31.6%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | ARMK | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -1.2% | -0.9% | -0.3% | -1.0% |
| 7D | +0.8% | -2.4% | +3.2% | +1.3% |
| 30D | +11.5% | 0.0% | +11.5% | +11.3% |
| 3M | +9.0% | +6.7% | +2.3% | +6.9% |
| 6M | +20.5% | +38.8% | -18.3% | +9.6% |
| YTD | +59.5% | +55.2% | +4.3% | +39.9% |
| 1Y | +77.9% | +46.6% | +31.3% | +58.6% |
| All | +261.9% | +120.0% | +141.9% | +188.9% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside ARMK.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus ARMK return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × ARMK return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded ARMK wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling