+48.2%
TQQQ vs NIO
-37.6%
+85.9%
-37.0%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 1y.
| Period | Portfolio | NIO | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -3.3% | -3.2% | 0.0% | -2.2% |
| 7D | -3.9% | -7.3% | +3.3% | -1.5% |
| 30D | -5.3% | -22.5% | +17.2% | +3.1% |
| 3M | +0.1% | -30.9% | +31.0% | +13.1% |
| 6M | +40.7% | -37.2% | +77.8% | +61.8% |
| YTD | +31.8% | -29.8% | +61.6% | +45.8% |
| 1Y | +48.2% | -37.4% | +85.6% | +90.9% |
| All | +48.2% | -37.6% | +85.9% | +90.9% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside NIO.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus NIO return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × NIO return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 1y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded NIO wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
1y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling