+310.3%
TPR vs NXT
+95.6%
+214.7%
-31.8%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | NXT | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | 0.0% | +1.2% | -1.2% | -0.2% |
| 7D | -2.3% | -1.1% | -1.2% | -2.1% |
| 30D | -23.0% | -15.3% | -7.6% | -21.0% |
| 3M | -12.5% | -43.8% | +31.3% | -4.4% |
| 6M | -21.4% | -18.7% | -2.8% | -20.5% |
| YTD | -3.5% | -3.0% | -0.5% | -6.2% |
| 1Y | +17.4% | +22.7% | -5.4% | +8.3% |
| All | +310.3% | +95.6% | +214.7% | +228.8% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside NXT.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus NXT return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × NXT return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded NXT wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling