+142.7%
TOST vs ZM
+57.7%
+85.0%
-54.7%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | ZM | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -1.7% | -0.4% | -1.3% | -1.5% |
| 7D | -4.7% | +10.0% | -14.7% | -8.4% |
| 30D | +8.5% | -0.5% | +9.0% | +8.3% |
| 3M | -1.6% | -7.1% | +5.5% | +0.5% |
| 6M | +44.1% | -5.1% | +49.2% | +44.7% |
| YTD | -5.6% | +13.2% | -18.8% | -13.6% |
| 1Y | -12.6% | +15.3% | -27.9% | -20.9% |
| All | +142.7% | +57.7% | +85.0% | +88.8% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside ZM.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus ZM return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × ZM return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded ZM wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling