+108.8%
TNA vs Z
-37.2%
+146.0%
-65.8%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | Z | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -4.1% | -0.7% | -3.5% | -3.7% |
| 7D | -3.6% | -7.1% | +3.5% | +0.7% |
| 30D | -10.1% | -4.8% | -5.3% | -8.2% |
| 3M | +2.7% | -9.3% | +12.0% | +6.3% |
| 6M | +38.4% | -29.0% | +67.4% | +68.0% |
| YTD | +45.4% | -52.9% | +98.3% | +131.2% |
| 1Y | +55.9% | -63.1% | +119.1% | +195.1% |
| All | +108.8% | -37.2% | +146.0% | +156.3% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside Z.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus Z return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × Z return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded Z wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling