+104.7%
TNA vs VICR
+209.3%
-104.6%
-65.8%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | VICR | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +1.1% | +11.2% | -10.1% | -3.6% |
| 7D | -7.3% | +5.0% | -12.2% | -9.4% |
| 30D | -14.2% | -12.5% | -1.7% | -10.3% |
| 3M | -4.6% | -33.6% | +29.0% | +7.6% |
| 6M | +36.9% | +10.7% | +26.3% | +15.6% |
| YTD | +42.5% | +80.6% | -38.0% | -6.5% |
| 1Y | +45.8% | +288.4% | -242.6% | -38.2% |
| 3Y | +104.7% | +213.8% | -109.1% | -16.7% |
| All | +104.7% | +209.3% | -104.6% | -16.7% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside VICR.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus VICR return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × VICR return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded VICR wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling