+102.5%
TNA vs PSKY
-20.6%
+123.1%
-65.8%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | PSKY | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -3.0% | +1.6% | -4.6% | -3.5% |
| 7D | -7.6% | -6.0% | -1.6% | -5.8% |
| 30D | -13.6% | +10.7% | -24.3% | -16.3% |
| 3M | +2.8% | +1.2% | +1.7% | +2.1% |
| 6M | +34.5% | +1.5% | +33.0% | +32.8% |
| YTD | +41.0% | -21.8% | +62.8% | +49.2% |
| 1Y | +52.0% | -30.2% | +82.2% | +64.4% |
| All | +102.5% | -20.6% | +123.1% | +89.5% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside PSKY.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus PSKY return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × PSKY return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded PSKY wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling