+32.6%
TNA vs PLTU
+142.1%
-109.6%
-63.6%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for all.
| Period | Portfolio | PLTU | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -1.3% | -4.7% | +3.4% | -0.3% |
| 7D | +4.1% | -11.6% | +15.7% | +6.1% |
| 30D | -7.6% | -4.6% | -3.0% | -7.7% |
| 3M | +8.1% | +33.7% | -25.6% | -4.2% |
| 6M | +49.0% | -9.4% | +58.4% | +40.3% |
| YTD | +51.7% | -34.7% | +86.4% | +51.3% |
| 1Y | +59.6% | -23.2% | +82.8% | +48.0% |
| All | +32.6% | +142.1% | -109.6% | -23.7% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside PLTU.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus PLTU return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × PLTU return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over all: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded PLTU wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
all analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling