+120.3%
TNA vs P
+155.2%
-34.9%
-65.8%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | P | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +0.7% | +1.4% | -0.7% | +0.1% |
| 7D | -0.1% | +6.5% | -6.6% | -3.0% |
| 30D | -4.9% | +18.8% | -23.7% | -13.6% |
| 3M | +0.4% | +26.7% | -26.4% | -12.1% |
| 6M | +32.5% | +62.2% | -29.6% | +0.9% |
| YTD | +53.7% | +48.5% | +5.2% | +20.6% |
| 1Y | +65.1% | +26.4% | +38.7% | +33.2% |
| All | +120.3% | +155.2% | -34.9% | +8.1% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside P.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus P return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × P return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded P wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling