+118.9%
TNA vs M
+120.4%
-1.6%
-65.8%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | M | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -1.3% | -2.6% | +1.3% | +0.3% |
| 7D | +4.1% | +2.4% | +1.7% | +2.5% |
| 30D | -7.6% | -11.6% | +4.0% | -0.3% |
| 3M | +8.1% | +1.6% | +6.5% | +6.0% |
| 6M | +49.0% | +25.2% | +23.8% | +28.1% |
| YTD | +51.7% | +3.8% | +48.0% | +45.3% |
| 1Y | +59.6% | +36.3% | +23.3% | +27.9% |
| 3Y | +118.9% | +116.3% | +2.6% | +3.6% |
| All | +118.9% | +120.4% | -1.6% | +3.6% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside M.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus M return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × M return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded M wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling