+30.7%
TNA vs LDOS
-30.4%
+61.1%
-32.5%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 1y.
| Period | Portfolio | LDOS | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +9.6% | +2.3% | +7.3% | +9.0% |
| 7D | +2.3% | -5.8% | +8.1% | +3.8% |
| 30D | +1.4% | +11.6% | -10.2% | -1.9% |
| 3M | -21.1% | -1.0% | -20.1% | -21.1% |
| 6M | -9.4% | +5.1% | -14.4% | -9.4% |
| YTD | +29.6% | -24.0% | +53.7% | +42.5% |
| All | +30.7% | -30.4% | +61.1% | +70.3% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside LDOS.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus LDOS return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × LDOS return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 1y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded LDOS wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
1y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling