+38.5%
TNA vs LDOS
-27.6%
+66.1%
-32.5%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 1y.
| Period | Portfolio | LDOS | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +4.4% | +0.7% | +3.7% | +4.2% |
| 7D | +2.4% | -2.8% | +5.2% | +3.0% |
| 30D | -0.9% | +13.6% | -14.5% | -4.5% |
| 3M | -19.2% | +4.2% | -23.4% | -20.5% |
| 6M | -0.8% | -8.2% | +7.4% | +4.6% |
| YTD | +33.2% | -24.1% | +57.3% | +47.2% |
| 1Y | +38.5% | -31.2% | +69.7% | +81.7% |
| All | +38.5% | -27.6% | +66.1% | +81.7% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside LDOS.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus LDOS return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × LDOS return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 1y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded LDOS wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
1y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling