+36.9%
TNA vs KRMN
-65.4%
+102.4%
-16.9%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 6mo.
| Period | Portfolio | KRMN | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +1.1% | +2.6% | -1.5% | +0.1% |
| 7D | -7.3% | -11.8% | +4.5% | -3.2% |
| 30D | -14.2% | -43.0% | +28.8% | +4.5% |
| 3M | -4.6% | -28.8% | +24.3% | +5.5% |
| 6M | +36.9% | -66.3% | +103.3% | +120.4% |
| All | +36.9% | -65.4% | +102.4% | +120.4% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside KRMN.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus KRMN return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × KRMN return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 6mo: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded KRMN wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
6mo analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling