+38.5%
TNA vs KRMN
-59.3%
+97.8%
-32.5%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 1y.
| Period | Portfolio | KRMN | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +4.4% | -13.5% | +17.9% | +8.8% |
| 7D | +2.4% | -10.0% | +12.5% | +5.2% |
| 30D | -0.9% | +3.5% | -4.4% | -3.4% |
| 3M | -19.2% | -36.7% | +17.5% | -6.8% |
| 6M | -0.8% | -47.7% | +46.8% | +20.4% |
| YTD | +33.2% | -53.3% | +86.5% | +57.7% |
| 1Y | +38.5% | -59.7% | +98.2% | +81.1% |
| All | +38.5% | -59.3% | +97.8% | +81.1% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside KRMN.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus KRMN return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × KRMN return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 1y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded KRMN wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
1y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling