+31.1%
TNA vs HTZ
-73.6%
+104.7%
-32.5%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 1y.
| Period | Portfolio | HTZ | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +2.7% | +9.3% | -6.7% | +0.8% |
| 7D | -2.1% | -27.4% | +25.3% | +4.1% |
| 30D | +3.1% | -11.4% | +14.5% | +5.7% |
| 3M | -20.2% | -33.1% | +12.9% | -14.9% |
| 6M | -10.0% | -73.5% | +63.5% | +19.4% |
| YTD | +30.3% | -68.1% | +98.4% | +54.6% |
| 1Y | +31.1% | -74.3% | +105.4% | +81.6% |
| All | +31.1% | -73.6% | +104.7% | +81.6% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside HTZ.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus HTZ return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × HTZ return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 1y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded HTZ wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
1y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling