+65.1%
TNA vs HTZ
-58.1%
+123.2%
-32.5%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 1y.
| Period | Portfolio | HTZ | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +0.7% | +1.3% | -0.6% | +0.6% |
| 7D | -0.1% | +7.5% | -7.6% | -1.0% |
| 30D | -4.9% | +47.4% | -52.3% | -10.9% |
| 3M | +0.4% | -54.9% | +55.3% | +10.0% |
| 6M | +32.5% | -47.0% | +79.5% | +41.3% |
| YTD | +53.7% | -55.3% | +109.0% | +67.7% |
| 1Y | +65.1% | -57.6% | +122.8% | +79.4% |
| All | +65.1% | -58.1% | +123.2% | +79.4% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside HTZ.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus HTZ return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × HTZ return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 1y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded HTZ wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
1y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling