+102.5%
TNA vs GRMN
+179.1%
-76.6%
-65.8%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | GRMN | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -3.0% | 0.0% | -3.0% | -3.0% |
| 7D | -7.6% | -1.8% | -5.8% | -6.2% |
| 30D | -13.6% | -12.1% | -1.5% | -3.8% |
| 3M | +2.8% | +18.0% | -15.2% | -13.7% |
| 6M | +34.5% | +13.7% | +20.8% | +17.7% |
| YTD | +41.0% | +35.3% | +5.7% | +4.8% |
| 1Y | +52.0% | +17.2% | +34.8% | +28.2% |
| All | +102.5% | +179.1% | -76.6% | -6.1% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside GRMN.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus GRMN return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × GRMN return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded GRMN wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling