+102.5%
TNA vs CLBK
+52.3%
+50.1%
-65.8%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | CLBK | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -3.0% | +0.5% | -3.5% | -3.7% |
| 7D | -7.6% | -1.4% | -6.2% | -6.0% |
| 30D | -13.6% | +4.5% | -18.2% | -18.6% |
| 3M | +2.8% | +22.8% | -20.0% | -22.3% |
| 6M | +34.5% | +43.4% | -8.9% | -16.4% |
| YTD | +41.0% | +64.1% | -23.1% | -27.6% |
| 1Y | +52.0% | +67.6% | -15.5% | -24.7% |
| All | +102.5% | +52.3% | +50.1% | +18.9% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside CLBK.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus CLBK return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × CLBK return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded CLBK wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling