+149.3%
TNA vs ARWR
+85.8%
+63.5%
-65.8%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | ARWR | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +2.7% | +0.7% | +1.9% | +2.3% |
| 7D | -2.1% | -19.9% | +17.8% | +6.8% |
| 30D | +3.1% | -18.7% | +21.8% | +11.8% |
| 3M | -20.2% | -44.7% | +24.5% | +2.1% |
| 6M | -10.0% | -36.5% | +26.5% | +6.3% |
| YTD | +30.3% | -25.7% | +56.0% | +41.5% |
| 1Y | +31.1% | +18.9% | +12.2% | +11.2% |
| All | +149.3% | +85.8% | +63.5% | +46.3% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside ARWR.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus ARWR return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × ARWR return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded ARWR wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling