-17.7%
TMUS vs PCG
-20.1%
+2.4%
-33.1%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 1y.
| Period | Portfolio | PCG | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +0.9% | -2.0% | +2.8% | +1.1% |
| 7D | +3.6% | -1.6% | +5.2% | +3.7% |
| 30D | -3.4% | +1.4% | -4.8% | -3.5% |
| 3M | -9.5% | -23.4% | +13.9% | -6.7% |
| 6M | -15.2% | -19.4% | +4.2% | -13.3% |
| YTD | -18.9% | -18.5% | -0.4% | -18.9% |
| 1Y | -17.7% | -19.5% | +1.8% | -17.4% |
| All | -17.7% | -20.1% | +2.4% | -17.4% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside PCG.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus PCG return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × PCG return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 1y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded PCG wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
1y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling