-19.1%
TMUS vs NIO
-55.0%
+35.8%
-33.1%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 1y.
| Period | Portfolio | NIO | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -0.6% | -4.9% | +4.3% | -0.9% |
| 7D | +4.9% | -14.5% | +19.4% | +4.1% |
| 30D | +7.7% | -15.0% | +22.7% | +6.9% |
| 3M | -6.8% | -35.6% | +28.8% | -8.0% |
| 6M | -9.7% | -55.7% | +46.0% | -10.8% |
| YTD | -15.0% | -43.1% | +28.2% | -16.0% |
| 1Y | -19.1% | -53.5% | +34.4% | -20.3% |
| All | -19.1% | -55.0% | +35.8% | -20.3% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside NIO.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus NIO return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × NIO return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 1y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded NIO wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
1y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling