+39.5%
TMUS vs GD
+68.4%
-28.9%
-37.1%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | GD | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -3.5% | -1.8% | -1.7% | -3.2% |
| 7D | +0.1% | -5.3% | +5.3% | +0.9% |
| 30D | +5.3% | -6.4% | +11.7% | +6.2% |
| 3M | +3.1% | +5.7% | -2.6% | +2.2% |
| 6M | -16.5% | -0.9% | -15.5% | -16.9% |
| YTD | -9.2% | +8.2% | -17.3% | -11.0% |
| 1Y | -26.5% | +13.4% | -39.9% | -28.7% |
| All | +39.5% | +68.4% | -28.9% | +26.5% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside GD.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus GD return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × GD return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded GD wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling