+3.1%
TMUS vs ECHO
-24.9%
+28.0%
-12.9%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3mo.
| Period | Portfolio | ECHO | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -3.5% | 0.0% | -3.5% | -3.5% |
| 7D | +0.1% | +3.4% | -3.3% | +0.6% |
| 30D | +5.3% | +2.4% | +2.9% | +5.6% |
| 3M | +3.1% | -28.0% | +31.1% | 0.0% |
| All | +3.1% | -24.9% | +28.0% | 0.0% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside ECHO.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus ECHO return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × ECHO return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3mo: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded ECHO wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3mo analysis · Full analysis span regression · Available span rolling