+20.9%
TMO vs NCLH
-28.2%
+49.0%
-17.6%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 6mo.
| Period | Portfolio | NCLH | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -0.4% | -1.9% | +1.5% | -0.1% |
| 7D | -2.5% | -6.5% | +4.1% | -1.3% |
| 30D | -0.3% | -22.1% | +21.8% | +4.1% |
| 3M | +25.3% | -18.7% | +44.0% | +27.9% |
| 6M | +20.9% | -28.4% | +49.3% | +28.6% |
| All | +20.9% | -28.2% | +49.0% | +28.6% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside NCLH.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus NCLH return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × NCLH return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 6mo: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded NCLH wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
6mo analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling