-88.0%
TMF vs ALHC
-64.2%
-23.8%
-90.9%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 5y.
| Period | Portfolio | ALHC | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -0.2% | -2.9% | +2.7% | -0.1% |
| 7D | +1.2% | +1.0% | +0.2% | +1.1% |
| 30D | +19.7% | -14.2% | +33.9% | +20.3% |
| 3M | -2.1% | -45.1% | +43.0% | -0.2% |
| 6M | -13.4% | -59.5% | +46.1% | -11.1% |
| YTD | -16.7% | -62.8% | +46.1% | -14.4% |
| 1Y | -23.3% | -55.5% | +32.1% | -21.7% |
| 3Y | -24.8% | +25.7% | -50.5% | -27.7% |
| All | -88.0% | -64.2% | -23.8% | -88.2% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside ALHC.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus ALHC return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × ALHC return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 5y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded ALHC wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
5y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling