+98.4%
THC vs KRMN
+33.3%
+65.2%
-34.1%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for all.
| Period | Portfolio | KRMN | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +0.6% | -1.3% | +1.9% | +0.7% |
| 7D | -0.7% | -12.3% | +11.6% | +0.6% |
| 30D | +1.3% | -27.5% | +28.7% | +4.4% |
| 3M | +64.2% | -26.5% | +90.7% | +68.3% |
| 6M | +8.3% | -59.6% | +67.8% | +18.0% |
| YTD | +33.4% | -45.4% | +78.7% | +35.0% |
| 1Y | +37.7% | -25.1% | +62.8% | +26.0% |
| All | +98.4% | +33.3% | +65.2% | +53.3% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside KRMN.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus KRMN return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × KRMN return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over all: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded KRMN wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
all analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling