+245.8%
THC vs FROG
+198.7%
+47.2%
-34.5%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | FROG | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +0.6% | -3.3% | +3.9% | +0.8% |
| 7D | -0.7% | -11.3% | +10.6% | -0.1% |
| 30D | +1.3% | +3.6% | -2.4% | +0.9% |
| 3M | +64.2% | +1.7% | +62.6% | +63.6% |
| 6M | +8.3% | +123.5% | -115.3% | +0.8% |
| YTD | +33.4% | +40.2% | -6.9% | +29.1% |
| 1Y | +37.7% | +81.0% | -43.3% | +28.1% |
| All | +245.8% | +198.7% | +47.2% | +183.4% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside FROG.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus FROG return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × FROG return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded FROG wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling